Comparative Political Analysis I: Approaches, Colonialism and Decolonization, Nationalism, State Theory and Political Regimes

Unit 4 is comparative politics' own toolkit: how it studies (approaches and methods), the historical break that shaped most of the world's states (colonialism and decolonization), the ideology that legitimises the modern state (nationalism), competing theories of what the state actually is, and a typology of the regimes states take, democratic and non-democratic alike.

1. Approaches to comparative political analysis

Four approaches
ApproachWhat it studies
InstitutionalFormal structures — constitutions, legislatures, executives, courts — described legalistically; the older, pre-behavioural mainstream of the discipline.
Political cultureGabriel Almond and Sidney Verba's 'The Civic Culture' (1963) — a nation's citizens' attitudes, beliefs and orientations toward the political system (parochial, subject, participant orientations) explain regime stability better than formal rules alone; a 'civic culture' blending participant and subject orientations best sustains stable democracy.
Political economyStudies politics through the lens of economic structures, class interests and the state's relationship to markets and production — asking who gains materially from a given political arrangement.
New institutionalismA late-20th-century revival: institutions are not neutral, static rules but themselves shape actor preferences and outcomes (rational-choice, historical, and sociological variants) — a self-conscious correction of behaviouralism's neglect of institutions and of old institutionalism's mere description.

The comparative method itself (following John Stuart Mill's logic of inquiry, adapted by Arend Lijphart) proceeds through most-similar-systems designs (comparing cases alike in most respects except the variable of interest, to isolate its effect) and most-different-systems designs (comparing very different cases that nonetheless share the outcome being explained, to identify what they have in common despite their differences) — the two standard strategies for drawing causal inferences from a small number of country cases where a controlled experiment is impossible.

2. Colonialism, decolonization and nationalism

  • Forms of colonialism — settler colonialism (large-scale permanent settlement displacing or eliminating the indigenous population, as in the Americas or Australia) versus exploitation/extractive colonialism (a smaller administrative-commercial presence extracting resources and labour without mass settlement, the more common pattern in British India and much of Africa); the distinction matters because it shapes the kind of post-colonial state and society that follows.
  • Anti-colonial struggles and decolonization — ranged from constitutional/gradualist paths (negotiated transfers of power, as in much of British decolonization after WWII) to armed anti-colonial struggle (Algeria, Vietnam); the post-1945 wave was accelerated by the weakening of European powers after two world wars, the rise of anti-colonial nationalism itself, and the UN's own normative commitment to self-determination.
Theorists of nationalism, European and non-European
ThinkerArgument
Ernest GellnerNationalism is a functional requirement of industrial society — industrialisation needs a mobile, standardised, literate workforce sharing one 'high culture'/language, which nationalism supplies; nations are a modern invention created by nationalism, not the reverse.
Benedict Anderson'Imagined Communities' (1983) — a nation is an 'imagined political community', imagined because most members will never meet yet feel a horizontal comradeship; print capitalism (mass-produced vernacular-language newspapers and novels) is what made this shared imagining technically possible.
Partha ChatterjeeNon-European/anticolonial nationalism cannot be read as a mere 'derivative discourse' copying European nationalism; it divides social life into a material (outer, Western-modelled: economy, statecraft, science) and a spiritual (inner, indigenous: culture, family, religion, language) domain, asserting sovereignty over the inner domain even before political independence is won.

3. State theory

The Marxist debate over the capitalist state's nature divides Ralph Miliband and Nicos Poulantzas. Miliband's instrumentalist view holds that the state serves capitalist class interests chiefly because the state elite is itself drawn from, socialised with, and personally connected to the capitalist class — an instrumental, personnel-based capture. Poulantzas's structuralist view instead argues the state serves capital's interests regardless of who staffs it, because of the state's own structural position within the capitalist mode of production — it must maintain the conditions for capital accumulation and social cohesion whatever the individual bureaucrats' personal ties or beliefs. The post-colonial state (Hamza Alavi, on Pakistan and Bangladesh) is theorised as 'overdeveloped' relative to the weakly-developed local bourgeoisie it inherited from the colonial power, with a bureaucratic-military apparatus disproportionately powerful compared to society. The welfare state (T.H. Marshall's social citizenship, met in Unit 1) uses taxation and social insurance to decommodify basic needs (health, unemployment support, pensions) that a pure market would otherwise leave to purchasing power alone.

⚠️ Instrumentalist vs structuralist is about WHY, not WHETHER
Both Miliband and Poulantzas agree the capitalist state serves capital's interests — the exam-testable disagreement is only about the mechanism: Miliband says it is because of who runs the state (personnel/instrument), Poulantzas says it is because of the state's structural position regardless of personnel.

4. Political regimes — democratic and non-democratic

Four democratic regime-types the syllabus names
TypeCharacter
Electoral democracyThe minimal criterion — regular, competitive, reasonably free elections determine who holds office, without a fuller guarantee of civil liberties or the rule of law.
Liberal democracyAdds, beyond elections, constitutionally protected civil liberties, the rule of law, an independent judiciary and horizontal accountability among branches of government.
Majoritarian democracyConcentrates power in the winning majority (Westminster-style single-party government, first-past-the-post) rather than dispersing it — Arend Lijphart's own contrast to consensus democracy.
Participatory democracyPrizes direct, active citizen involvement in decision-making beyond periodic voting — referenda, citizen assemblies, deliberative forums, participatory budgeting — as a corrective to purely representative/procedural democracy's thin citizen role.
Five non-democratic regime-types
TypeCharacter
Patrimonialism (Weber)Rule is a personal extension of the ruler's household — office, loyalty and resources are distributed as personal favours, with no real separation between public office and the ruler's private domain.
Bureaucratic authoritarianism (Guillermo O'Donnell)A military-technocratic alliance rules through the state bureaucracy to impose economic 'modernisation' and suppress popular/labour mobilisation seen as a threat to that project — O'Donnell's account of 1960s-70s South American military regimes (Brazil, Argentina).
Military dictatorshipArmed forces directly hold state power, typically after a coup, ruling through military command structures rather than civilian institutions or a mass party.
Totalitarianism (Arendt, Carl Friedrich)Total state control penetrating and mobilising every sphere of life — not merely political repression but an all-encompassing ideology, a single mass party, terror/secret police, and monopoly control of media, the economy and armed force (Nazi Germany, Stalinist USSR).
FascismAn ultra-nationalist, often militarist and anti-liberal, anti-communist ideology and regime-type prizing a mythic national/racial rebirth, a charismatic leader-cult, and the total subordination of the individual to the nation-state.
⚠️ Totalitarianism is not merely 'strict' authoritarianism
The exam-testable line: an authoritarian regime (including bureaucratic authoritarianism, military dictatorship, or classic patrimonialism) generally wants citizens' obedience and depoliticised passivity — it leaves much of private and social life alone as long as it is not politically threatening. Totalitarianism, by Arendt's and Friedrich's own definition, wants active mobilisation and ideological conviction — it seeks to eliminate the very distinction between public and private life, which is the difference between merely being controlled and being wholly remade.

Key takeaways

  • The institutional, political-culture (Almond & Verba), political-economy and new-institutionalism approaches, plus Mill's most-similar/most-different comparative method, are comparative politics' own toolkit.
  • Settler and exploitation colonialism produced different post-colonial trajectories; Gellner ties nationalism to industrial society's needs, Anderson to print capitalism's imagined community, and Chatterjee argues non-European nationalism is not a mere derivative discourse.
  • Miliband's instrumentalist and Poulantzas's structuralist accounts both hold the capitalist state serves capital's interests, disagreeing only over the mechanism; Alavi's post-colonial state is 'overdeveloped' relative to a weak local bourgeoisie.
  • Electoral, liberal, majoritarian and participatory democracy are the syllabus's four democratic types; patrimonialism, bureaucratic authoritarianism, military dictatorship, totalitarianism and fascism are its five non-democratic types.
  • Totalitarianism (Arendt) is distinguished from ordinary authoritarianism by seeking active ideological mobilisation and eliminating the public-private distinction, not merely depoliticised obedience.

Practice questions (10)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. Gabriel Almond and Sidney Verba's 'The Civic Culture' (1963) explains regime stability chiefly through:

    1. Citizens' political attitudes and orientations toward the system
    2. The state's structural position in capitalism
    3. Print capitalism
    4. Military-technocratic alliances
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Citizens' political attitudes and orientations toward the system

    This is the political-culture approach's own claim; the others belong to Poulantzas, Anderson and O'Donnell.
  2. New institutionalism, as a corrective to earlier approaches, argues that institutions:

    1. Actively shape actor preferences and outcomes rather than being neutral rules
    2. Are irrelevant to political outcomes
    3. Should be studied only through print capitalism
    4. Are a mere personal extension of the ruler's household
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Actively shape actor preferences and outcomes rather than being neutral rules

    New institutionalism corrects both behaviouralism (which neglected institutions) and old institutionalism (mere description) by showing institutions actively shape outcomes; the last option describes patrimonialism.
  3. Settler colonialism is distinguished from exploitation/extractive colonialism chiefly by:

    1. Large-scale permanent settlement displacing the indigenous population
    2. A smaller administrative presence extracting resources without mass settlement
    3. Print capitalism
    4. A single mass party
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Large-scale permanent settlement displacing the indigenous population

    Settler colonialism is defined by large-scale permanent settlement; extraction with minimal settlement is the exploitation/extractive form, more common in British India.
  4. Benedict Anderson's 'Imagined Communities' (1983) argues that a nation becomes imaginable chiefly through:

    1. Print capitalism — mass-produced vernacular newspapers and novels
    2. Industrial society's need for a mobile workforce
    3. A material versus spiritual domain split
    4. Bureaucratic authoritarian alliances
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Print capitalism — mass-produced vernacular newspapers and novels

    Print capitalism is Anderson's own mechanism; the industrial-society claim is Gellner's, and the material/spiritual split is Chatterjee's.
  5. Partha Chatterjee argues that non-European anticolonial nationalism asserted sovereignty, even before independence, over a distinct:

    1. Spiritual/inner domain of culture, family and religion
    2. Material domain of economy and statecraft alone
    3. The state's monopoly of armed force
    4. Print capitalism's technology
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Spiritual/inner domain of culture, family and religion

    Chatterjee's specific claim is about the inner/spiritual domain, precisely because the material/outer domain remained Western-modelled; this is what makes his account more than a 'derivative discourse' thesis.
  6. Ralph Miliband's instrumentalist account of the capitalist state explains its class bias chiefly through:

    1. The state elite's own social origin and personal ties to the capitalist class
    2. The state's structural position within capitalism regardless of personnel
    3. Print capitalism
    4. A civic culture of participant orientations
    Show answer

    Answer: A — The state elite's own social origin and personal ties to the capitalist class

    Miliband's is the personnel/instrument-based account; the structural, personnel-independent account is Poulantzas's own rival position.
  7. Hamza Alavi's theory of the post-colonial state describes it as 'overdeveloped' relative to:

    1. A weakly-developed local bourgeoisie inherited from the colonial power
    2. An advanced industrial workforce
    3. A charismatic leader-cult
    4. A single dominant civic culture
    Show answer

    Answer: A — A weakly-developed local bourgeoisie inherited from the colonial power

    Alavi's specific claim, developed on Pakistan and Bangladesh, is about a bureaucratic-military apparatus disproportionately powerful relative to a weak local bourgeoisie.
  8. Majoritarian democracy, in Arend Lijphart's own contrast, is distinguished from consensus/participatory forms by:

    1. Concentrating power in the winning majority rather than dispersing it
    2. Direct citizen involvement through referenda and citizen assemblies
    3. A monopoly of the state's armed force
    4. A personal extension of the ruler's household
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Concentrating power in the winning majority rather than dispersing it

    Majoritarian democracy concentrates power (Westminster-style); direct citizen involvement is participatory democracy's own feature, and the other two options describe totalitarianism and patrimonialism.
  9. Guillermo O'Donnell's 'bureaucratic authoritarianism', developed on 1960s-70s South American regimes, describes rule by:

    1. A military-technocratic alliance imposing economic modernisation and suppressing popular mobilisation
    2. A single charismatic leader ruling through a mass party alone
    3. A ruler's household extended into public office
    4. A civic culture of subject orientations
    Show answer

    Answer: A — A military-technocratic alliance imposing economic modernisation and suppressing popular mobilisation

    O'Donnell's specific regime-type combines a military-technocratic alliance with bureaucratic rule and suppression of labour/popular mobilisation; the fascist leader-cult and patrimonialism describe different regime-types.
  10. Totalitarianism, as Hannah Arendt and Carl Friedrich define it, is distinguished from ordinary authoritarianism chiefly by:

    1. Seeking active ideological mobilisation and eliminating the public-private distinction
    2. Simply demanding depoliticised obedience
    3. Ruling through the ruler's personal household
    4. Holding regular competitive elections
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Seeking active ideological mobilisation and eliminating the public-private distinction

    Ordinary authoritarian regimes typically want passive obedience and leave much of private life alone; totalitarianism, by this definition, wants active conviction and total penetration of life, which is the sharper, exam-tested distinction.