Strategic Management: Concept and Process, External and Internal Analysis, Strategy Formulation, Portfolio Models and Implementation

Unit 6 opens with strategic management, the most framework-dense sub-unit on the Management paper after OB: the process, the analysis tools (PEST, Porter's five forces, the resource-based view, the value chain), the formulation tools (SWOT, the corporate strategy menu, BCG, GE and Ansoff) and implementation (change, programmes, the McKinsey 7-S). The paper asks which tool does what, whose name is attached, what the cells of each matrix are called and what each prescribes. This chapter gives each framework as a table of its parts.

1. Strategic management: concept, process, decisions and types of strategy

Strategy is the determination of the basic long-term goals of an enterprise and the adoption of courses of action and allocation of resources to carry them out (Chandler, 1962); Mintzberg's five Ps say it is a plan, a ploy, a pattern of behaviour, a position in the market and a perspective, and he distinguishes intended, deliberate, emergent and realised strategy. Strategic management is the set of decisions and actions that result in the formulation and implementation of plans designed to achieve a company's objectives (Pearce and Robinson) — the whole-organisation, long-range, environment-facing counterpart of operational management. Strategic decisions are made at the top, commit large resources, are hard to reverse, concern the scope and direction of the firm and its match with the environment, and are taken under uncertainty; tactical decisions implement them over the medium term and operational decisions run the day. Strategy exists at three levels: corporate (which businesses to be in — the portfolio), business or competitive (how to compete in each — Porter's generic strategies, the SBU level) and functional (marketing, finance, HR, operations strategies that support the business strategy); a fourth, global or international, decides entry and coordination across countries. Strategic intent gives the hierarchy of vision (what we want to become), mission (why we exist, for whom — Drucker's 'what is our business?'), goals and objectives (SMART), and values.

  1. Strategic intent — vision, mission, business definition (Abell's customer groups, customer functions, technologies), goals and objectives.
  2. Environmental scanning and strategic analysis — external appraisal for opportunities and threats (PEST, industry analysis), internal appraisal for strengths and weaknesses (resources, capabilities, value chain), summarised in SWOT.
  3. Strategy formulation — generating alternatives at corporate, business and functional levels, evaluating them (suitability, acceptability, feasibility — Johnson and Scholes), and choosing.
  4. Strategy implementation — programmes, budgets and procedures; structure, systems, culture, leadership and resource allocation aligned to the strategy.
  5. Strategic evaluation and control — premise control, implementation control, strategic surveillance and special alert control (Pearce and Robinson); the balanced scorecard as the measurement system; feedback to every earlier stage.

2. Strategic analysis: external (PEST, Porter's industry analysis) and internal (resource-based view, value chain)

External analysis works from the macro environment inward. PEST analysis (Aguilar's ETPS, 1967) scans the political (stability, policy, regulation, trade), economic (growth, inflation, interest, exchange rates, income), social (demography, culture, lifestyles, education) and technological (R&D, automation, innovation rates) forces; PESTEL adds environmental and legal, and STEEPLE adds ethics. The industry environment is Porter's five forces (1979, 1980): the threat of new entrants (barriers — scale, capital, switching costs, access to distribution, brand, government policy, experience curve), the bargaining power of suppliers (concentration, uniqueness, switching costs, forward-integration threat), the bargaining power of buyers (volume, standard product, low switching costs, backward-integration threat, price sensitivity), the threat of substitutes (price-performance of alternatives) and rivalry among existing competitors (number and balance, growth, fixed costs, differentiation, exit barriers); Brandenburger and Nalebuff's complementors are the proposed sixth. Strong forces mean low industry profitability, which is why Porter says strategy is finding a position where the forces are weakest. The industry life cycle (introduction, growth, shakeout, maturity, decline), strategic group mapping, competitor analysis (Porter's four components — future goals, assumptions, current strategy, capabilities), key success factors and the environmental threat and opportunity profile (ETOP) complete the external toolkit.

Internal analysis: the resource-based view and the value chain
ToolAuthorsStructurePoint tested
Resource-based viewPenrose (1959), Wernerfelt (1984), Barney (1991), GrantCompetitive advantage comes from inside — from resources (tangible, intangible, human) and capabilities (what the firm does with them) that are heterogeneous across firms and imperfectly mobile; Barney's VRIO test: valuable, rare, inimitable (path dependence, causal ambiguity, social complexity), organised to exploitInside-out against Porter's outside-in; passing all four VRIO tests gives sustained advantage, passing three gives temporary advantage
Core competence and dynamic capabilitiesPrahalad and Hamel (1990); Teece, Pisano and Shuen (1997)A core competence is collective learning that gives access to many markets, contributes to perceived customer benefit and is hard to imitate — the roots of the 'corporate tree'; dynamic capabilities are the ability to integrate, build and reconfigure competences as environments changeDistinctive competence (Selznick) is the older term; Honda's engines and Canon's optics are the textbook examples
Value chain analysisPorter (1985)Five primary activities — inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, service — and four support activities — firm infrastructure, human resource management, technology development, procurement — with margin as the difference between total value and cost; linkages within the chain and with suppliers' and buyers' chains (the value system)Used to find where cost advantage or differentiation is created and what to outsource; procurement is a support activity, not primary; benchmarking compares each activity with the best
Other internal toolsVariousStrategic advantage profile (SAP), functional-area audit, financial ratio analysis, the 7-S audit, organisational capability profile, experience curve (Boston Consulting Group — unit cost falls a constant percentage each time cumulative output doubles), competitive advantage as the sum of cost or differentiation positionETOP is external, SAP internal; the two feed SWOT

3. Strategy formulation: SWOT, corporate strategies, and portfolio analysis (BCG, GE, Ansoff)

SWOT analysis (attributed to Albert Humphrey at Stanford in the 1960s, and to Learned, Christensen, Andrews and Guth's Harvard text of 1965) lays internal strengths and weaknesses against external opportunities and threats; the TOWS matrix (Weihrich, 1982) turns the four cells into strategies — SO (use strengths to seize opportunities), ST (use strengths to avert threats), WO (overcome weaknesses through opportunities), WT (minimise both — defensive). Corporate strategies are the grand-strategy menu (Glueck): stability (pause or proceed with caution, no change, profit strategy — incremental improvement in a stable environment), growth or expansion (intensification — market penetration, market development, product development; integration — horizontal, and vertical backward or forward; diversification — related or concentric, and unrelated or conglomerate; cooperation — mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances; internationalisation), retrenchment (turnaround — cutting costs and assets to reverse decline; divestment — selling a business; liquidation — closing and selling assets, the last resort), and combination (different strategies for different businesses or sequentially). Business-level strategy is Porter's three generic strategies — overall cost leadership, differentiation, and focus (cost focus or differentiation focus on a narrow segment) — with 'stuck in the middle' as the failure to choose, and the strategic clock (Bowman and Faulkner), blue-ocean strategy (Kim and Mauborgne — create uncontested space) and Miles and Snow's defender, prospector, analyser and reactor as the alternatives. Functional strategies then translate the chosen business strategy into marketing, finance, operations and HR plans.

Business portfolio models
ModelAxesCells and prescriptionsLimits
BCG growth-share matrix (Boston Consulting Group, Henderson, 1970)Market growth rate (vertical, high above about 10%) against relative market share (horizontal, high above 1.0 — the SBU's share divided by the largest rival's; log scale, high on the left)Stars (high-high: build, invest), cash cows (low growth, high share: harvest, fund others), question marks or problem children (high growth, low share: build selectively or divest), dogs (low-low: divest or harvest); the success sequence is question mark to star to cash cow; circle size is SBU salesTwo variables only; share and growth are not the only drivers of cash; dogs can be profitable; assumes the experience curve
GE-McKinsey nine-cell matrix (General Electric with McKinsey, early 1970s)Industry attractiveness (size, growth, profitability, competitive intensity, technology, regulation — weighted composite) against business strength or competitive position (share, growth in share, quality, brand, cost, distribution — weighted composite), each high, medium, lowThree zones: invest and grow (the three cells at top left), selectivity and earnings (the diagonal), harvest and divest (the three at bottom right); the 'stoplight' or 'business screen' modelRicher than BCG but subjective in weighting and scoring
Ansoff's product-market growth matrix (1957)Products (existing, new) against markets (existing, new)Market penetration (existing-existing: more sales to current customers — lowest risk), market development (existing product, new market or segment or geography), product development (new product, existing market), diversification (new-new — highest risk; related or unrelated)A growth-vector tool for the intensification and diversification strategies, not a portfolio balance tool
Others the paper namesShell directional policy matrix (sector prospects against competitive capabilities), Hofer's product-market evolution matrix (life-cycle stage against competitive position), Arthur D. Little's life-cycle matrix, the Boston 'strategic environments' matrix, parenting-advantage (Goold and Campbell)All allocate resources across SBUs by two composite dimensionsPortfolio analysis assumes SBUs are independent, which synergy denies
⚠️ BCG's axes, GE's zones and Ansoff's risk order
BCG measures relative share (against the largest competitor), not absolute share, and plots high share on the left. GE has nine cells and three zones, BCG four cells. In Ansoff the risk rises from penetration through market development and product development to diversification; a question describing 'selling existing products to a new geographic market' wants market development, and 'a new product for a new market' wants diversification. The GE matrix's composite axes are exactly what BCG lacks — that is the usual 'advantage of GE over BCG' question.

4. Strategy implementation: challenges of change, developing programmes and the McKinsey 7-S framework

Implementation is where most strategies fail — Kaplan and Norton's estimate is that the great majority of strategies are never fully executed — because formulation is analytical and implementation is behavioural. Its tasks are developing programmes (the specific activities that put the strategy into effect), budgets (the programmes costed) and procedures (standard operating procedures), and then aligning the organisation: structure (Chandler's 'structure follows strategy' — functional for single businesses, divisional for diversified, matrix for projects, network for outsourced, and the SBU structure for portfolio management), systems (information, control, reward), leadership (strategic leadership, the CEO as chief implementer), culture (fit or change it), and resource allocation (budgeting linked to strategy). The challenges of change are resistance (individual and organisational, from habit, fear, loss of power, inertia, poor communication), the tension between the existing culture and the new strategy, misaligned incentives, lack of middle-management buy-in, poor coordination and inadequate skills; they are met through Lewin's unfreezing-moving-refreezing, Kotter's eight steps, participation, communication, quick wins, changing structures and rewards, and leadership that models the change. Strategic control then checks whether the premises still hold and whether implementation is on track; the balanced scorecard, milestone reviews and strategic audits are its instruments, and Mintzberg's warning is that in a changing environment strategy also emerges from below and implementation feeds back into formulation.

The McKinsey 7-S framework (Peters, Waterman, Pascale and Athos, 1980)
ElementHard or softMeaning
StrategyHardThe plan to build and sustain competitive advantage
StructureHardHow the organisation is divided and who reports to whom
SystemsHardThe formal and informal procedures — planning, budgeting, information, reward, control
Shared values (superordinate goals)Soft — the centre of the modelThe core beliefs and culture that hold the other six together
SkillsSoftThe distinctive capabilities of the organisation as a whole
StyleSoftThe leadership and management style of the top
StaffSoftThe people — how they are recruited, developed, motivated and rewarded
🎯 Why the 7-S is a diagnostic, not a checklist
The framework's claim is that the seven elements are interdependent and must be aligned for a strategy to work — change one and the others must follow, which is why the model is drawn as a web with shared values at the centre and no hierarchy among the nodes. The hard Ss are easy to define and change directly; the soft Ss are harder to describe and take longer to shift, and are where implementation stalls. The paper's usual question is either 'which is not a 7-S element' (structure, strategy, systems, shared values, skills, style, staff — anything else is the distractor) or 'which elements are hard' (strategy, structure, systems).

Key takeaways

  • Chandler defined strategy and said structure follows it; Mintzberg's five Ps and emergent strategy qualify the planning view; strategy runs at corporate, business and functional levels through intent, analysis, formulation, implementation and control.
  • PEST is the macro scan; Porter's five forces are entrants, suppliers, buyers, substitutes and rivalry, and strong forces mean low profitability; the RBV (Barney's VRIO) and Prahalad-Hamel core competence look inside; Porter's value chain has five primary and four support activities.
  • Grand strategies are stability, growth (intensification, integration, diversification, cooperation), retrenchment (turnaround, divestment, liquidation) and combination; Porter's generic strategies are cost leadership, differentiation and focus.
  • BCG plots market growth against relative share into stars, cash cows, question marks and dogs; GE plots industry attractiveness against business strength in nine cells and three zones; Ansoff's four growth vectors rise in risk from penetration to diversification.
  • Implementation means programmes, budgets and procedures plus alignment of structure, systems, culture and leadership against resistance to change; the 7-S has three hard elements (strategy, structure, systems) and four soft (shared values at the centre, skills, style, staff).

Practice questions (9)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. 'Structure follows strategy' is the thesis of:

    1. Alfred Chandler
    2. Michael Porter
    3. Igor Ansoff
    4. Henry Mintzberg
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Alfred Chandler

    Chandler's Strategy and Structure (1962) studied Du Pont, General Motors, Standard Oil and Sears and found that changes in strategy led to changes in structure. Porter gave the five forces and generic strategies, Ansoff the growth matrix, Mintzberg the five Ps and emergent strategy.
  2. Which of the following is NOT one of Porter's five competitive forces?

    1. Government regulation
    2. Threat of new entrants
    3. Bargaining power of buyers
    4. Threat of substitute products
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Government regulation

    The five are new entrants, supplier power, buyer power, substitutes and rivalry among existing firms. Government appears only as a source of entry barriers within the first force; Porter rejected making it a sixth force, and the proposed sixth in the literature is complementors.
  3. In Barney's VRIO framework, a resource that is valuable, rare and costly to imitate but that the firm is not organised to exploit yields:

    1. An unused (unrealised) competitive advantage
    2. A sustained competitive advantage
    3. Competitive parity
    4. A competitive disadvantage
    Show answer

    Answer: A — An unused (unrealised) competitive advantage

    Passing all four tests gives sustained advantage; valuable and rare but imitable gives temporary advantage; valuable but not rare gives parity; not valuable gives disadvantage; and failing only the organisation test leaves potential unrealised. VRIO is the operational form of the resource-based view.
  4. In Porter's value chain, which of the following is a SUPPORT activity rather than a primary activity?

    1. Procurement
    2. Inbound logistics
    3. Marketing and sales
    4. Service
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Procurement

    The four support activities are firm infrastructure, human resource management, technology development and procurement; the five primary activities are inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and service. Procurement is the commonest wrong answer because it sounds operational.
  5. A company that sells a business division to another firm in order to concentrate on its core is pursuing which grand strategy?

    1. Retrenchment — divestment
    2. Stability
    3. Growth — horizontal integration
    4. Retrenchment — liquidation
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Retrenchment — divestment

    Divestment sells or spins off a business while the firm continues; liquidation closes the whole firm and sells its assets as the last resort; turnaround cuts costs to reverse decline. Horizontal integration acquires a competitor, the opposite direction.
  6. In the BCG matrix, a strategic business unit with high market growth but low relative market share is a:

    1. Question mark (problem child)
    2. Star
    3. Cash cow
    4. Dog
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Question mark (problem child)

    Question marks consume cash to keep up with a growing market without the share to generate it; the firm must build them into stars or divest. Stars are high-high, cash cows low growth and high share, dogs low-low.
  7. The GE nine-cell matrix improves on the BCG matrix chiefly because it:

    1. Uses composite, multi-factor measures of industry attractiveness and business strength instead of single measures of growth and share
    2. Has fewer cells and is simpler to apply
    3. Prescribes 100% investment in every business
    4. Ignores the competitive position of the business
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Uses composite, multi-factor measures of industry attractiveness and business strength instead of single measures of growth and share

    GE-McKinsey scores industry attractiveness (size, growth, profitability, intensity) and competitive position (share, quality, cost, brand) on weighted scales with three levels each, giving nine cells and three zones — invest, select, harvest. Its cost is subjectivity in the weights.
  8. In Ansoff's product-market matrix, the strategy that carries the highest risk is:

    1. Diversification
    2. Market penetration
    3. Market development
    4. Product development
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Diversification

    Diversification puts a new product into a new market, so the firm lacks knowledge of both; penetration is the safest, and market and product development each change one dimension. Unrelated (conglomerate) diversification is riskier still than related.
  9. In the McKinsey 7-S framework, the 'hard' elements are:

    1. Strategy, structure and systems
    2. Skills, style and staff
    3. Shared values, strategy and staff
    4. Structure, style and shared values
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Strategy, structure and systems

    Hard elements are tangible and directly manageable; the four soft elements — shared values at the centre, skills, style and staff — are cultural and take longer to change. The model's claim is that all seven must be aligned.