Strategic Management: Concept and Process, External and Internal Analysis, Strategy Formulation, Portfolio Models and Implementation
2. Strategic analysis: external (PEST, Porter's industry analysis) and internal (resource-based view, value chain)
External analysis works from the macro environment inward. PEST analysis (Aguilar's ETPS, 1967) scans the political (stability, policy, regulation, trade), economic (growth, inflation, interest, exchange rates, income), social (demography, culture, lifestyles, education) and technological (R&D, automation, innovation rates) forces; PESTEL adds environmental and legal, and STEEPLE adds ethics. The industry environment is Porter's five forces (1979, 1980): the threat of new entrants (barriers — scale, capital, switching costs, access to distribution, brand, government policy, experience curve), the bargaining power of suppliers (concentration, uniqueness, switching costs, forward-integration threat), the bargaining power of buyers (volume, standard product, low switching costs, backward-integration threat, price sensitivity), the threat of substitutes (price-performance of alternatives) and rivalry among existing competitors (number and balance, growth, fixed costs, differentiation, exit barriers); Brandenburger and Nalebuff's complementors are the proposed sixth. Strong forces mean low industry profitability, which is why Porter says strategy is finding a position where the forces are weakest. The industry life cycle (introduction, growth, shakeout, maturity, decline), strategic group mapping, competitor analysis (Porter's four components — future goals, assumptions, current strategy, capabilities), key success factors and the environmental threat and opportunity profile (ETOP) complete the external toolkit.
| Tool | Authors | Structure | Point tested |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resource-based view | Penrose (1959), Wernerfelt (1984), Barney (1991), Grant | Competitive advantage comes from inside — from resources (tangible, intangible, human) and capabilities (what the firm does with them) that are heterogeneous across firms and imperfectly mobile; Barney's VRIO test: valuable, rare, inimitable (path dependence, causal ambiguity, social complexity), organised to exploit | Inside-out against Porter's outside-in; passing all four VRIO tests gives sustained advantage, passing three gives temporary advantage |
| Core competence and dynamic capabilities | Prahalad and Hamel (1990); Teece, Pisano and Shuen (1997) | A core competence is collective learning that gives access to many markets, contributes to perceived customer benefit and is hard to imitate — the roots of the 'corporate tree'; dynamic capabilities are the ability to integrate, build and reconfigure competences as environments change | Distinctive competence (Selznick) is the older term; Honda's engines and Canon's optics are the textbook examples |
| Value chain analysis | Porter (1985) | Five primary activities — inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, service — and four support activities — firm infrastructure, human resource management, technology development, procurement — with margin as the difference between total value and cost; linkages within the chain and with suppliers' and buyers' chains (the value system) | Used to find where cost advantage or differentiation is created and what to outsource; procurement is a support activity, not primary; benchmarking compares each activity with the best |
| Other internal tools | Various | Strategic advantage profile (SAP), functional-area audit, financial ratio analysis, the 7-S audit, organisational capability profile, experience curve (Boston Consulting Group — unit cost falls a constant percentage each time cumulative output doubles), competitive advantage as the sum of cost or differentiation position | ETOP is external, SAP internal; the two feed SWOT |
3. Strategy formulation: SWOT, corporate strategies, and portfolio analysis (BCG, GE, Ansoff)
SWOT analysis (attributed to Albert Humphrey at Stanford in the 1960s, and to Learned, Christensen, Andrews and Guth's Harvard text of 1965) lays internal strengths and weaknesses against external opportunities and threats; the TOWS matrix (Weihrich, 1982) turns the four cells into strategies — SO (use strengths to seize opportunities), ST (use strengths to avert threats), WO (overcome weaknesses through opportunities), WT (minimise both — defensive). Corporate strategies are the grand-strategy menu (Glueck): stability (pause or proceed with caution, no change, profit strategy — incremental improvement in a stable environment), growth or expansion (intensification — market penetration, market development, product development; integration — horizontal, and vertical backward or forward; diversification — related or concentric, and unrelated or conglomerate; cooperation — mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, strategic alliances; internationalisation), retrenchment (turnaround — cutting costs and assets to reverse decline; divestment — selling a business; liquidation — closing and selling assets, the last resort), and combination (different strategies for different businesses or sequentially). Business-level strategy is Porter's three generic strategies — overall cost leadership, differentiation, and focus (cost focus or differentiation focus on a narrow segment) — with 'stuck in the middle' as the failure to choose, and the strategic clock (Bowman and Faulkner), blue-ocean strategy (Kim and Mauborgne — create uncontested space) and Miles and Snow's defender, prospector, analyser and reactor as the alternatives. Functional strategies then translate the chosen business strategy into marketing, finance, operations and HR plans.
| Model | Axes | Cells and prescriptions | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCG growth-share matrix (Boston Consulting Group, Henderson, 1970) | Market growth rate (vertical, high above about 10%) against relative market share (horizontal, high above 1.0 — the SBU's share divided by the largest rival's; log scale, high on the left) | Stars (high-high: build, invest), cash cows (low growth, high share: harvest, fund others), question marks or problem children (high growth, low share: build selectively or divest), dogs (low-low: divest or harvest); the success sequence is question mark to star to cash cow; circle size is SBU sales | Two variables only; share and growth are not the only drivers of cash; dogs can be profitable; assumes the experience curve |
| GE-McKinsey nine-cell matrix (General Electric with McKinsey, early 1970s) | Industry attractiveness (size, growth, profitability, competitive intensity, technology, regulation — weighted composite) against business strength or competitive position (share, growth in share, quality, brand, cost, distribution — weighted composite), each high, medium, low | Three zones: invest and grow (the three cells at top left), selectivity and earnings (the diagonal), harvest and divest (the three at bottom right); the 'stoplight' or 'business screen' model | Richer than BCG but subjective in weighting and scoring |
| Ansoff's product-market growth matrix (1957) | Products (existing, new) against markets (existing, new) | Market penetration (existing-existing: more sales to current customers — lowest risk), market development (existing product, new market or segment or geography), product development (new product, existing market), diversification (new-new — highest risk; related or unrelated) | A growth-vector tool for the intensification and diversification strategies, not a portfolio balance tool |
| Others the paper names | Shell directional policy matrix (sector prospects against competitive capabilities), Hofer's product-market evolution matrix (life-cycle stage against competitive position), Arthur D. Little's life-cycle matrix, the Boston 'strategic environments' matrix, parenting-advantage (Goold and Campbell) | All allocate resources across SBUs by two composite dimensions | Portfolio analysis assumes SBUs are independent, which synergy denies |
4. Strategy implementation: challenges of change, developing programmes and the McKinsey 7-S framework
Implementation is where most strategies fail — Kaplan and Norton's estimate is that the great majority of strategies are never fully executed — because formulation is analytical and implementation is behavioural. Its tasks are developing programmes (the specific activities that put the strategy into effect), budgets (the programmes costed) and procedures (standard operating procedures), and then aligning the organisation: structure (Chandler's 'structure follows strategy' — functional for single businesses, divisional for diversified, matrix for projects, network for outsourced, and the SBU structure for portfolio management), systems (information, control, reward), leadership (strategic leadership, the CEO as chief implementer), culture (fit or change it), and resource allocation (budgeting linked to strategy). The challenges of change are resistance (individual and organisational, from habit, fear, loss of power, inertia, poor communication), the tension between the existing culture and the new strategy, misaligned incentives, lack of middle-management buy-in, poor coordination and inadequate skills; they are met through Lewin's unfreezing-moving-refreezing, Kotter's eight steps, participation, communication, quick wins, changing structures and rewards, and leadership that models the change. Strategic control then checks whether the premises still hold and whether implementation is on track; the balanced scorecard, milestone reviews and strategic audits are its instruments, and Mintzberg's warning is that in a changing environment strategy also emerges from below and implementation feeds back into formulation.
| Element | Hard or soft | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy | Hard | The plan to build and sustain competitive advantage |
| Structure | Hard | How the organisation is divided and who reports to whom |
| Systems | Hard | The formal and informal procedures — planning, budgeting, information, reward, control |
| Shared values (superordinate goals) | Soft — the centre of the model | The core beliefs and culture that hold the other six together |
| Skills | Soft | The distinctive capabilities of the organisation as a whole |
| Style | Soft | The leadership and management style of the top |
| Staff | Soft | The people — how they are recruited, developed, motivated and rewarded |
Key takeaways
- Chandler defined strategy and said structure follows it; Mintzberg's five Ps and emergent strategy qualify the planning view; strategy runs at corporate, business and functional levels through intent, analysis, formulation, implementation and control.
- PEST is the macro scan; Porter's five forces are entrants, suppliers, buyers, substitutes and rivalry, and strong forces mean low profitability; the RBV (Barney's VRIO) and Prahalad-Hamel core competence look inside; Porter's value chain has five primary and four support activities.
- Grand strategies are stability, growth (intensification, integration, diversification, cooperation), retrenchment (turnaround, divestment, liquidation) and combination; Porter's generic strategies are cost leadership, differentiation and focus.
- BCG plots market growth against relative share into stars, cash cows, question marks and dogs; GE plots industry attractiveness against business strength in nine cells and three zones; Ansoff's four growth vectors rise in risk from penetration to diversification.
- Implementation means programmes, budgets and procedures plus alignment of structure, systems, culture and leadership against resistance to change; the 7-S has three hard elements (strategy, structure, systems) and four soft (shared values at the centre, skills, style, staff).
Practice questions (9)
Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.
'Structure follows strategy' is the thesis of:
Show answer
Answer: A — Alfred Chandler
Chandler's Strategy and Structure (1962) studied Du Pont, General Motors, Standard Oil and Sears and found that changes in strategy led to changes in structure. Porter gave the five forces and generic strategies, Ansoff the growth matrix, Mintzberg the five Ps and emergent strategy.Which of the following is NOT one of Porter's five competitive forces?
Show answer
Answer: A — Government regulation
The five are new entrants, supplier power, buyer power, substitutes and rivalry among existing firms. Government appears only as a source of entry barriers within the first force; Porter rejected making it a sixth force, and the proposed sixth in the literature is complementors.In Barney's VRIO framework, a resource that is valuable, rare and costly to imitate but that the firm is not organised to exploit yields:
Show answer
Answer: A — An unused (unrealised) competitive advantage
Passing all four tests gives sustained advantage; valuable and rare but imitable gives temporary advantage; valuable but not rare gives parity; not valuable gives disadvantage; and failing only the organisation test leaves potential unrealised. VRIO is the operational form of the resource-based view.In Porter's value chain, which of the following is a SUPPORT activity rather than a primary activity?
Show answer
Answer: A — Procurement
The four support activities are firm infrastructure, human resource management, technology development and procurement; the five primary activities are inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing and sales, and service. Procurement is the commonest wrong answer because it sounds operational.A company that sells a business division to another firm in order to concentrate on its core is pursuing which grand strategy?
Show answer
Answer: A — Retrenchment — divestment
Divestment sells or spins off a business while the firm continues; liquidation closes the whole firm and sells its assets as the last resort; turnaround cuts costs to reverse decline. Horizontal integration acquires a competitor, the opposite direction.In the BCG matrix, a strategic business unit with high market growth but low relative market share is a:
Show answer
Answer: A — Question mark (problem child)
Question marks consume cash to keep up with a growing market without the share to generate it; the firm must build them into stars or divest. Stars are high-high, cash cows low growth and high share, dogs low-low.The GE nine-cell matrix improves on the BCG matrix chiefly because it:
Show answer
Answer: A — Uses composite, multi-factor measures of industry attractiveness and business strength instead of single measures of growth and share
GE-McKinsey scores industry attractiveness (size, growth, profitability, intensity) and competitive position (share, quality, cost, brand) on weighted scales with three levels each, giving nine cells and three zones — invest, select, harvest. Its cost is subjectivity in the weights.In Ansoff's product-market matrix, the strategy that carries the highest risk is:
Show answer
Answer: A — Diversification
Diversification puts a new product into a new market, so the firm lacks knowledge of both; penetration is the safest, and market and product development each change one dimension. Unrelated (conglomerate) diversification is riskier still than related.In the McKinsey 7-S framework, the 'hard' elements are:
Show answer
Answer: A — Strategy, structure and systems
Hard elements are tangible and directly manageable; the four soft elements — shared values at the centre, skills, style and staff — are cultural and take longer to change. The model's claim is that all seven must be aligned.