Management I: Concept, Theories, Functions, Communication, Decision Making and Organisation Design

Unit 1 of the Management paper is two units wearing one number: the first half is the management process and its classical theory, the second half is managerial economics, ethics and governance. This chapter takes the first half. The paper asks it as names and sequences — who said what, in what order the functions run, which barrier a described failure of communication is, which decision technique fits a described situation, and what a given span of control or structure implies. Everything below is arranged so that a name, a list and its order can be recalled together.

1. Management: concept, process, theories and approaches, roles and skills

Management is the process of getting things done through others, efficiently and effectively, in a changing environment — Koontz's 'art of getting things done through and with people in formally organised groups', Mary Parker Follett's 'art of getting things done through people', Drucker's insistence that it is a practice judged by results. Its nature is examined as a set of contrasts: science and art, profession or not, universal or culture-bound, and a process that is goal-oriented, pervasive, continuous, intangible and group-based. Efficiency is doing things right (output per input); effectiveness is doing the right things (attaining the goal); Drucker's line is that effectiveness is the foundation of success and efficiency the minimum condition for survival.

Schools of management thought, in the order they arose
SchoolNames and datesCore ideaWhat the paper asks
Scientific managementF. W. Taylor, 1911; Gilbreths (motion study); Gantt (chart, task-and-bonus)One best way found by time and motion study; functional foremanship; differential piece rate; mental revolutionTaylor's four principles; 'father of scientific management'; the shop floor, not the whole firm
Administrative / classicalHenri Fayol, 1916 (General and Industrial Management); Urwick, Gulick, Mooney and ReileyFive elements — plan, organise, command, coordinate, control — and fourteen principles: division of work, authority and responsibility, discipline, unity of command, unity of direction, subordination of individual interest, remuneration, centralisation, scalar chain (with gangplank), order, equity, stability of tenure, initiative, esprit de corps'Father of modern management theory'; top-down view; unity of command versus Taylor's functional foremanship
BureaucracyMax WeberHierarchy, rules, impersonality, division of labour, technical competence, written records, career officialsRational-legal authority as the ideal type; the dysfunctions — red tape, goal displacement — Merton and Gouldner
Human relations / neo-classicalElton Mayo, Roethlisberger — Hawthorne studies at Western Electric, 1924–32; Follett; Barnard (acceptance theory of authority, 1938)Social factors and informal groups govern output more than physical conditions; the Hawthorne effectFour phases — illumination, relay assembly, interviewing, bank wiring; the informal group's restriction of output
Behavioural scienceMaslow, McGregor (Theory X and Y, 1960), Herzberg, Likert, ArgyrisMotivation, leadership, group dynamics studied with the methods of psychology and sociologyAssumptions of X and Y; Likert's System 4
Quantitative / management scienceOperations research after 1945Models, optimisation, statistics for decisionsIts limit — it does not handle the human side
Systems approachBoulding, Katz and Kahn, Churchman; Bertalanffy's general systems theoryThe organisation as an open system: inputs, transformation, outputs, feedback; subsystems; synergy; entropyOpen versus closed system; boundary; equifinality
Contingency / situationalLawrence and Lorsch, Woodward, Burns and Stalker, Fiedler; Lorsch coined the term 1967No one best way; the right structure and style depend on technology, environment and size'It depends' as a theory; mechanistic versus organic structures
ModernDrucker (MBO, 1954), Peters and Waterman (In Search of Excellence, 1982), Senge (learning organisation, 1990), Ouchi (Theory Z, 1981)Knowledge work, quality, learning, cultureTheory Z blends American and Japanese practice; Senge's five disciplines
🧠 Mintzberg's ten roles and Katz's three skills
Mintzberg (1973) observed managers and grouped what they do into three families of ten roles. Interpersonal — figurehead, leader, liaison. Informational — monitor, disseminator, spokesperson. Decisional — entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator, negotiator. Robert Katz (1955) named three skills whose mix changes with level: technical (most needed at the supervisory level), human (needed equally at every level) and conceptual (most needed at the top). A question that describes a manager settling a strike is asking 'disturbance handler'; one that describes a manager cutting a ribbon is asking 'figurehead'.

2. Functions of management, and communication

  1. Planning — deciding in advance what, how, when and who: objectives, strategies, policies, procedures, rules, programmes, budgets. Types by level (strategic, tactical, operational), by time (long, medium, short), by repetition (standing versus single-use). Steps: awareness of opportunity, objectives, premises, alternatives, evaluation, selection, derivative plans, budgets. MBO (Drucker, 1954) sets objectives jointly and appraises against them. Planning is primary — every other function follows it.
  2. Organising — identifying and grouping work, defining authority and responsibility, establishing relationships: departmentation (by function, product, territory, customer, process, matrix), delegation, decentralisation, span.
  3. Staffing — manpower planning, recruitment, selection, placement, training, appraisal, compensation, promotion; the human-resource function seen as a managerial function.
  4. Directing — leading, motivating, communicating, supervising; Koontz and O'Donnell's list; the syllabus names coordinating in its place, which Fayol listed as a separate element and Koontz called 'the essence of management' running through all functions rather than a function of its own.
  5. Controlling — setting standards, measuring performance, comparing, correcting deviations. Types: feed-forward (before), concurrent (during), feedback (after). Techniques: budgets, break-even, ratios, PERT/CPM, MIS, audits, management by exception. Planning and control are the Siamese twins of management — control without a plan has nothing to measure against.

Communication is the transfer of information and understanding from one person to another. The process (Shannon and Weaver's model adapted to management) runs sender, encoding, message, channel, decoding, receiver, feedback, with noise at every stage. Types are classified by direction — downward (orders, policies), upward (reports, grievances, suggestions), horizontal or lateral (between peers), diagonal (across levels and departments); by channel — formal (chain, wheel, Y, circle, all-channel networks) and informal (the grapevine, in Keith Davis's four patterns: single strand, gossip, probability, cluster — cluster being the most common); by medium — verbal (oral, written) and non-verbal (body language, paralanguage, proxemics, time, silence).

Barriers to communication
ClassExamplesRemedy
SemanticBadly expressed message, words with several meanings, jargon, faulty translation, unclarified assumptionsSimple language, clarity, feedback
PsychologicalPremature evaluation, lack of attention, distrust, emotions, selective perception, filtering, information overloadActive listening, empathy, trust
OrganisationalPolicy, rules, status differences, complex structure, too many levels, wrong channelFlatter structure, open-door policy, multiple channels
PersonalSuperiors' fear of challenge to authority, lack of confidence in subordinates, unwillingness to communicate; subordinates' fear, lack of incentiveParticipation, incentives, climate of openness
Physical / mechanicalNoise, distance, time, defective equipmentBetter medium and setting
ℹ️ The seven Cs, and Johari's four panes
Effective communication is checked against seven Cs — clear, concise, concrete, correct, coherent, complete, courteous. The Johari window (Luft and Ingham, 1955) maps self-knowledge against others' knowledge into the arena (known to both), the blind spot (known to others only), the façade (known to self only) and the unknown; feedback shrinks the blind spot, disclosure shrinks the façade. Both lists have been asked as ordering or matching items.

3. Decision making: concept, process, techniques and tools

A decision is a choice among alternatives; Herbert Simon called management 'decision making' and the manager a decision maker. His model has three phases — intelligence, design, choice — and his lasting contribution is bounded rationality: managers do not optimise, they 'satisfice', accepting the first alternative that is good enough, because information, time and cognitive capacity are limited. Decisions are programmed (routine, repetitive, handled by rules and procedures, taken at lower levels) or non-programmed (novel, unstructured, requiring judgement, taken at the top); strategic, tactical or operational; individual or group; and taken under certainty, risk (probabilities known) or uncertainty (probabilities unknown). The rational process runs: identify and define the problem, gather information and diagnose, develop alternatives, evaluate alternatives (Drucker's limiting or strategic factor — the one that stands in the way), select the best, implement, and follow up and evaluate.

Techniques and tools of decision making
TechniqueWhat it doesUsed when
Payoff matrix and decision rulesOutcomes of each alternative under each state of nature; under risk choose by expected monetary value, under uncertainty by maximax, maximin, minimax regret, Laplace or HurwiczQuantifiable alternatives with known states
Decision treeSequential decisions drawn as decision nodes (squares) and chance nodes (circles), folded back by expected valueMulti-stage choices under risk
Marginal and cost-benefit analysisCompare additional revenue with additional cost; compare total benefits and costs, often discountedOutput, pricing and project choices
Linear programming, queuing, simulation, game theoryOperations-research models: optimise under constraints, size service capacity, imitate a system, anticipate rivalsStructured, quantifiable problems
BrainstormingOsborn (1938): a group generates ideas freely, no criticism, quantity first, build on others' ideasCreative alternatives; suffers from production blocking
Nominal group techniqueMembers write ideas silently, present in turn, discuss, then rank by secret voteWhen dominant members would distort open discussion
Delphi techniqueRAND, 1950s: anonymous experts answer questionnaires in rounds with summarised feedback until they converge; the experts never meetLong-range and technological forecasting
Devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiryOne member argues against the favoured plan; or two teams develop opposing plans and debateTo counter groupthink (Janis) in cohesive groups
⚠️ Heuristics are shortcuts, and the paper asks their names
Tversky and Kahneman's biases recur in the decision-making sub-unit: availability (judging frequency by how easily examples come to mind), representativeness (judging by resemblance to a stereotype, ignoring base rates), anchoring (over-weighting the first figure), overconfidence, confirmation bias, framing effects, escalation of commitment (throwing good money after bad) and hindsight bias. Satisficing is not a bias; it is Simon's description of rational behaviour under limits.

4. Organisation structure and design: types, authority, responsibility, centralisation and span

Types of organisation structure
TypeHow authority flowsStrengthWeakness
Line (military, scalar)Straight down the chain; each person has one bossSimple, clear, quick decisions, unity of commandOverloaded executives, no specialists, autocratic
Functional (Taylor)Specialists command over their function across the firmExpertise, specialisationViolates unity of command; conflict; slow
Line and staffLine commands; staff advises (personal, specialised, general staff)Expert advice without breaking the chainLine-staff conflict; staff has authority of ideas but not of command; functional authority blurs it
Divisional (product, territory, customer)Self-contained divisions, each with its functions, as profit centres; Sloan at General MotorsAccountability, focus, faster responseDuplication of functions, rivalry
Matrix (project)Two-boss system: functional and project managers share authority over the same peopleFlexible use of specialists across projectsViolates unity of command; power struggles; role ambiguity
CommitteeA group with delegated authority — standing or ad hoc, line or staff, formal or informalPooled judgement, coordination, acceptanceSlow, costly, compromise, split responsibility
Network, virtual, boundaryless, team-basedA small core outsources functions to independent firms linked by contract and ITLean, flexible, globalLoss of control and culture

Authority is the right to command and to make decisions, attached to a position; Weber's three sources are traditional, charismatic and rational-legal, and the formal theory says it flows down from ownership while Barnard's acceptance theory says it exists only when subordinates accept it. Responsibility is the obligation to perform the assigned duty, and it cannot be delegated: authority is delegated, responsibility is created for the subordinate but the superior's own remains, and accountability — answerability for results — flows upward. The principle of parity says authority and responsibility should be equal. Delegation is the entrustment of part of one's work and authority to a subordinate — assignment of duties, grant of authority, creation of accountability — and its barriers are the superior's fear of loss of control and the subordinate's fear of criticism. Centralisation concentrates decision authority at the top; decentralisation disperses it systematically to lower levels, and Fayol treated the degree of it as a matter of proportion. Delegation is between two persons; decentralisation is a philosophy of the whole organisation. Its measure (Ernest Dale) is the number, importance, scope of decisions taken lower down and how little checking they need.

🎯 Span of control, and why Graicunas made it a formula
Span of control is the number of subordinates a manager can supervise effectively. A narrow span produces a tall structure with many levels, close supervision, slow communication and high cost; a wide span produces a flat structure with few levels, more delegation and faster communication. The classical writers gave numbers — Urwick's four at the top and eight to twelve at the bottom — and V. A. Graicunas (1933) showed why small increases matter: with n subordinates the relationships a manager must attend to are n(2^(n-1) + n − 1), so 4 subordinates create 44 relationships and 5 create 100. The contingency view says the right span depends on the nature of work, subordinates' competence, the manager's ability, the degree of delegation, standardisation, communication technology and geographic dispersion — Lockheed's variables. Tall versus flat is the design consequence, and the modern movement to flatter structures rests on trained subordinates and information systems widening the feasible span.

Organisation design is the choice among these structures, and the contingency findings guide it. Burns and Stalker (1961) contrasted mechanistic structures (rigid, hierarchical, suited to stable environments) with organic ones (flexible, lateral, suited to change). Joan Woodward (1965) tied structure to production technology — unit, mass and process — finding successful firms matched structure to technology. Lawrence and Lorsch (1967) showed that firms in uncertain environments differentiated more and needed more integration. Chandler's thesis is that structure follows strategy; Mintzberg's five configurations are the simple structure, machine bureaucracy, professional bureaucracy, divisionalised form and adhocracy, each with a dominant part — strategic apex, technostructure, operating core, middle line, support staff. Formalisation, specialisation, standardisation, hierarchy of authority and centralisation are the dimensions along which any design is measured.

Key takeaways

  • Taylor (1911) is scientific management on the shop floor; Fayol (1916) is the fourteen principles and five elements from the top; Weber is bureaucracy; Mayo's Hawthorne studies founded human relations; systems and contingency say the organisation is open and 'it depends'.
  • Mintzberg's ten roles fall into interpersonal, informational and decisional; Katz's technical skill matters most at the bottom, conceptual at the top, human at every level.
  • Planning is primary and control is its twin; coordination is the essence running through every function; communication barriers are semantic, psychological, organisational, personal and physical, and the grapevine's commonest pattern is the cluster.
  • Simon's bounded rationality means satisficing, not optimising; programmed decisions are routine and low-level, non-programmed novel and top-level; Delphi keeps experts apart, nominal group votes in silence, brainstorming forbids criticism.
  • Authority can be delegated, responsibility cannot; decentralisation is a philosophy, delegation a two-person act; a narrow span makes a tall structure, and Graicunas's n(2^(n-1)+n−1) shows why five subordinates mean 100 relationships.

Practice questions (9)

Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.

  1. The fourteen principles of management, including unity of command, scalar chain and esprit de corps, were given by:

    1. Henri Fayol
    2. F. W. Taylor
    3. Max Weber
    4. Elton Mayo
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Henri Fayol

    Fayol's General and Industrial Management (1916) lists the fourteen principles and five elements. Taylor gave four principles of scientific management, Weber the model of bureaucracy, and Mayo the Hawthorne studies.
  2. The Hawthorne studies at the Western Electric Company are associated with:

    1. Elton Mayo and the human relations movement
    2. Frank and Lillian Gilbreth and motion study
    3. Chester Barnard and the acceptance theory of authority
    4. Peter Drucker and management by objectives
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Elton Mayo and the human relations movement

    Mayo and Roethlisberger's studies (1924–32) found social factors and informal groups governed output more than lighting or rest pauses, founding the human relations school. The Gilbreths belong to scientific management, Barnard to the social-systems view, Drucker to modern management.
  3. In Mintzberg's classification of managerial roles, 'disturbance handler' and 'resource allocator' belong to which group?

    1. Decisional roles
    2. Interpersonal roles
    3. Informational roles
    4. Technical roles
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Decisional roles

    The four decisional roles are entrepreneur, disturbance handler, resource allocator and negotiator. Interpersonal roles are figurehead, leader and liaison; informational roles are monitor, disseminator and spokesperson. 'Technical' is one of Katz's skills, not a Mintzberg role.
  4. According to Robert Katz, which managerial skill is needed in roughly equal measure at every level of management?

    1. Human skill
    2. Technical skill
    3. Conceptual skill
    4. Design skill
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Human skill

    Technical skill matters most at supervisory level and conceptual skill at the top, but human skill — working with and through people — is required equally throughout. Design skill was added later by Koontz and is not in Katz's original three.
  5. Keith Davis identified four patterns of grapevine communication. The most common is the:

    1. Cluster chain
    2. Single-strand chain
    3. Gossip chain
    4. Probability chain
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Cluster chain

    In the cluster chain a person tells a few selected others, each of whom tells a few more; Davis found it the dominant pattern. Single strand passes one to one, gossip has one person telling everyone, and probability passes at random.
  6. Herbert Simon's concept of 'bounded rationality' holds that decision makers:

    1. Satisfice, accepting the first alternative that is good enough, because information and cognitive capacity are limited
    2. Always choose the alternative that maximises expected value
    3. Cannot make rational decisions at all
    4. Should delegate every non-programmed decision
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Satisfice, accepting the first alternative that is good enough, because information and cognitive capacity are limited

    Simon's administrative man replaces the economic man's optimising with satisficing — a rational response to limits, not an absence of rationality. Maximising expected value is the classical rational model that bounded rationality qualifies.
  7. A forecasting technique in which a panel of experts who never meet answer successive rounds of questionnaires with summarised feedback until their views converge is the:

    1. Delphi technique
    2. Nominal group technique
    3. Brainstorming
    4. Devil's advocacy
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Delphi technique

    Delphi, developed at RAND in the 1950s, keeps experts anonymous and apart to avoid dominance and bandwagon effects. The nominal group meets but writes and votes silently; brainstorming is open idea generation without criticism; devil's advocacy assigns a member to argue against the favoured plan.
  8. Which organisation structure deliberately violates the principle of unity of command by giving an employee both a functional manager and a project manager?

    1. Matrix organisation
    2. Line organisation
    3. Line and staff organisation
    4. Divisional organisation
    Show answer

    Answer: A — Matrix organisation

    The matrix superimposes project authority on functional authority, so each member has two bosses; its price is role ambiguity and power struggles. Line preserves unity of command strictly, line and staff keeps staff advisory, and divisions are self-contained units.
  9. According to Graicunas's formula, a manager with 5 subordinates has to attend to how many relationships?

    1. 100
    2. 44
    3. 25
    4. 222
    Show answer

    Answer: A — 100

    The formula is n(2^(n−1) + n − 1). For n = 5: 5 × (16 + 4) = 100. Four subordinates give 44 and six give 222, which is why the classical writers argued for narrow spans at the top.