Intelligence and Creativity: Spearman, Thurstone, Jensen, Cattell, Gardner, Sternberg, Goleman and the PASS Model of Das, Kar and Parrila; Creativity after Torrance, Getzels and Jackson, Guilford, and Wallach and Kogan; and the Intelligence–Creativity Relationship
2. Gardner, Sternberg and Goleman
Howard Gardner (Frames of Mind, 1983) proposed multiple intelligences — relatively independent capacities identified by criteria such as isolation by brain damage, the existence of savants and prodigies, a distinct developmental history, evolutionary plausibility and a symbol system. The original seven were linguistic, logical–mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily–kinaesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal; he added naturalist intelligence in 1999 and discussed a possible existential intelligence. Critics note weak psychometric support and that several "intelligences" are talents.
| Sternberg's triarchic theory (1985) | Content |
|---|---|
| Componential (analytical) subtheory | The internal mental mechanisms: metacomponents (planning, monitoring and evaluating problem solving), performance components (executing the strategies) and knowledge-acquisition components (learning new information). |
| Experiential (creative) subtheory | The ability to deal with novelty and to automatise processing with experience. |
| Contextual (practical) subtheory | Intelligence in everyday life: adapting to the environment, shaping it, or selecting a different one; includes tacit knowledge. |
Emotional intelligence was introduced by Peter Salovey and John Mayer (1990) and popularised by Daniel Goleman's Emotional Intelligence (1995), which the syllabus names. Goleman's model has five domains: self-awareness, self-regulation (managing one's emotions), motivation, empathy and social skills, and he argued that they predict success in life and work beyond IQ. Mayer and Salovey's own ability model has four branches — perceiving, using, understanding and managing emotions — measured by the MSCEIT; Goleman's broader "mixed" model blends abilities with personality traits and has been criticised for overlapping with them.
3. The PASS model of Das, Kar and Parrila
J. P. Das, with Binod C. Kar and Rauno K. Parrila (Cognitive Planning, 1996) and with Jack Naglieri and John Kirby (1994), developed the PASS theory of intelligence from A. R. Luria's neuropsychological model of three functional units of the brain. Intelligence is described not as a quantity of g but as four interdependent cognitive processes.
| Process | Luria's functional unit | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| Planning | Third unit — prefrontal cortex | Selecting, applying and evaluating strategies; self-regulation and impulse control |
| Attention (arousal) | First unit — brainstem and reticular system | Maintaining arousal and focusing selectively while resisting distraction |
| Simultaneous processing | Second unit — occipital–parietal areas | Integrating separate elements into a single whole — matrices, spatial relations, understanding complex grammar |
| Successive processing | Second unit — fronto-temporal areas | Handling information in a serial order — remembering a sequence, decoding words, following instructions in order |
The theory is measured by the Das–Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) and linked to remediation through the PASS Reading Enhancement Programme (PREP), which trains successive and simultaneous processing in children with reading difficulties. Its advantages are a basis in neuropsychology, smaller group differences than traditional IQ tests, and direct links from diagnosis to intervention — for example, children with attention-deficit problems score low on planning and attention, while many poor readers are weak in successive processing.
4. Creativity: Torrance, Getzels and Jackson, Guilford, and Wallach and Kogan
| Researcher | Contribution |
|---|---|
| J. P. Guilford | His 1950 presidential address to the American Psychological Association launched modern creativity research. His Structure of Intellect model classifies abilities by operations × contents × products; it began with 120 abilities (5 × 4 × 6) and grew to 150 (5 × 5 × 6) and then 180 (6 × 5 × 6). He distinguished convergent production (one correct answer) from divergent production (many possible answers) — the core of creativity, scored for fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration. |
| E. Paul Torrance | The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (verbal and figural forms), scored for fluency, flexibility, originality and elaboration; long-term follow-ups found that childhood scores predicted adult creative achievement. |
| Getzels and Jackson (1962) | Creativity and Intelligence compared a high-IQ group with a high-creative group of adolescents: the creative group had a mean IQ some 23 points lower yet achieved as well at school; teachers preferred the high-IQ pupils; and the creative group's stories and drawings were more humorous and unconventional. |
| Wallach and Kogan (1965) | Modes of Thinking in Young Children: creativity tasks given in a relaxed, untimed, game-like atmosphere, scored for the number and uniqueness of associations. Under these conditions creativity was largely independent of intelligence, giving four groups (high or low on each) with distinct profiles — for example, high-creative, low-intelligence children were the most disadvantaged in the classroom. |
The relationship between intelligence and creativity. Across studies the correlation between IQ and divergent-thinking scores is positive but modest, around 0.2 to 0.3. The threshold hypothesis holds that intelligence is necessary but not sufficient for creativity: below an IQ of about 120 the two are correlated, but above it further IQ adds little and other factors — personality (openness, tolerance of ambiguity, intrinsic motivation), knowledge and environment — decide creative output. Getzels and Jackson's and Wallach and Kogan's findings both support treating creativity as a distinct dimension, especially when it is measured under permissive, game-like conditions. Worked: in Guilford's version with five operations, five contents and six products, the Structure of Intellect contains 5 × 5 × 6 = 150 distinct abilities.
Key takeaways
- Spearman: g plus specific factors; Thurstone: seven primary mental abilities; Cattell: fluid versus crystallised intelligence and investment theory; Jensen: Level I associative versus Level II conceptual ability.
- Gardner proposed seven (later eight) multiple intelligences; Sternberg's triarchic theory ("Stenberg" in the syllabus) has componential, experiential and contextual parts; Goleman's emotional intelligence has five domains, building on Salovey and Mayer.
- Das, Kar and Parrila's PASS model — planning, attention, simultaneous and successive processing — rests on Luria's three functional units and is measured by the Cognitive Assessment System.
- Guilford distinguished divergent from convergent production within his Structure of Intellect; Torrance built the standard creativity tests; Getzels and Jackson and Wallach and Kogan showed creativity to be distinct from IQ.
- Intelligence and creativity correlate modestly; the threshold hypothesis places the break at an IQ of about 120, above which personality, motivation and environment matter more.
Practice questions (10)
Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.
In the PASS theory of Das, Kar and Parrila, the ability to integrate separate stimuli into a single whole, as in solving matrices, is:
Show answer
Answer: B — Simultaneous processing
Simultaneous processing synthesises elements into a whole (matrices, spatial relations); successive processing handles serial order; planning selects and evaluates strategies; attention–arousal maintains alertness and focus.The PASS model of intelligence is based on the neuropsychological theory of:
Show answer
Answer: A — A. R. Luria
Das and his colleagues built PASS on Luria's three functional units of the brain: arousal–attention, coding (simultaneous and successive) and planning.Jensen's Level II ability refers to:
Show answer
Answer: C — Conceptual reasoning and abstract problem solving, closely related to g
Jensen distinguished Level I (associative: rote learning, short-term memory) from Level II (cognitive: abstract reasoning, transformation of information), and identified Level II with g.In the version of Guilford's Structure of Intellect model with five operations, five contents and six products, how many distinct abilities are there? Type a number.
Numerical answer — type the value.
Show answer
Answer: 150
The model crosses operations, contents and products, so the number of abilities is 5 × 5 × 6 = 150. The original model had 120 (5 × 4 × 6) and the final one 180 (6 × 5 × 6).Which component of Sternberg's triarchic theory concerns adapting to, shaping and selecting environments?
Show answer
Answer: B — Contextual (practical)
The contextual subtheory is about practical intelligence in the real world — adapting, shaping or selecting environments. The componential subtheory covers internal mechanisms such as metacomponents, and the experiential subtheory novelty and automatisation.Which of the following were among Gardner's ORIGINAL seven intelligences (1983)? Select all that apply.
Show answer
Answer: A — Bodily–kinaesthetic; B — Intrapersonal; D — Musical
The original seven were linguistic, logical–mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily–kinaesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal. Naturalist intelligence was added in 1999.Getzels and Jackson (1962) found that, compared with a high-IQ group, their high-creative adolescents:
Show answer
Answer: D — Had a markedly lower mean IQ yet achieved as well at school
The high-creative group averaged about 23 IQ points lower but matched the high-IQ group in scholastic achievement; teachers, however, preferred the high-IQ pupils.Assertion (A): Wallach and Kogan found creativity to be largely independent of intelligence in young children. Reason (R): They administered creativity tasks in a relaxed, untimed, game-like setting rather than under test-like conditions. Choose the correct option.
Show answer
Answer: A — Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both are true and R explains A: removing test pressure stopped the creativity tasks from measuring the same evaluative, convergent skills as IQ tests, so the two dimensions separated.Which statements about Cattell's fluid and crystallised intelligence are correct? Select all that apply.
Show answer
Answer: A — Crystallised intelligence tends to be maintained or to rise into old age; B — Fluid intelligence involves reasoning with novel problems; D — Fluid intelligence tends to decline from early adulthood
Gf is novel reasoning that peaks early and declines; Gc is accumulated knowledge that holds up with age. Gc is precisely the part most dependent on education and culture, so the last statement is false.Which of the following is one of the five domains of Goleman's model of emotional intelligence?
Show answer
Answer: A — Empathy
Goleman's five domains are self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy and social skills. Perceptual speed is one of Thurstone's primary abilities, successive processing belongs to PASS, and crystallised knowledge to Cattell.