International Relations II: The United Nations, Globalisation and Political Economy, Regional Organisations, and Contemporary Challenges
2. Political economy of IR and globalisation
| Institution/grouping | Role |
|---|---|
| Bretton Woods system (1944) | Established the IMF (short-term balance-of-payments support, exchange-rate stability) and the World Bank (long-term development finance) alongside a fixed exchange-rate system tied to the US dollar (itself pegged to gold) — the dollar-gold peg collapsed in 1971 ('Nixon shock'), but the IMF and World Bank endure as the system's institutional legacy. |
| WTO (1995, succeeding GATT) | Governs multilateral trade rules and dispute settlement among member states, aiming at progressive trade liberalisation. |
| North-South dialogue | Negotiations (from the 1970s New International Economic Order demand onward) between developed ('North') and developing ('South') countries over a fairer international economic order — trade terms, debt, technology transfer, aid. |
| G-20 | The premier forum for international economic cooperation since the 2008 financial crisis, bringing together 19 major economies plus the EU (and now the African Union), reflecting a shift of economic-governance weight beyond the older G-7. |
| BRICS | Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (joined 2010) — a grouping of major emerging economies coordinating positions on global economic governance and, through the New Development Bank (2015), offering an alternative to Bretton Woods-institution financing. |
3. Regional organisations
| Organisation | Character |
|---|---|
| European Union (EU) | The deepest regional integration project in existence — a single market, a common currency (the euro) for most members, pooled sovereignty through supranational institutions (European Commission, Parliament, Court of Justice) alongside intergovernmental ones (Council). |
| African Union (AU) | Successor to the Organisation of African Unity (2002), pursuing continental political and economic integration and, distinctively, asserting a right to intervene in a member state facing grave circumstances (genocide, war crimes) under its own Constitutive Act. |
| Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) | A Eurasian political, economic and security grouping (China, Russia, India, Pakistan and Central Asian states among its members) focused on regional security cooperation, counter-terrorism and economic ties. |
| ASEAN | Ten Southeast Asian member states pursuing economic integration and regional stability through the distinctive 'ASEAN way' of consensus, non-interference and informal consultation rather than the EU's binding supranational rules. |
4. Contemporary challenges
- International terrorism — non-state, transnational networks using violence against civilians for political ends, complicating traditional state-centric security responses and raising jurisdictional and human-rights questions in counter-terrorism cooperation.
- Climate change and environmental concerns — a genuinely global commons problem where no single state can solve the issue alone, institutionalised through the UNFCCC (1992), the Kyoto Protocol (1997) and the Paris Agreement (2015, nationally determined contributions rather than binding top-down targets).
- Human rights — the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) and subsequent covenants (ICCPR, ICESCR, both 1966) as the normative bedrock, contested over universality versus cultural relativism and over enforcement mechanisms that remain far weaker than domestic ones.
- Migration and refugees — the 1951 Refugee Convention's non-refoulement principle (no return to persecution) versus states' sovereign right to control borders, sharpened by climate-driven displacement that existing refugee law does not clearly cover.
- Poverty, development, and religion/culture/identity politics — persistent global inequality (framed earlier by dependency and world-systems theory) alongside the rise of identity-based and religiously-inflected politics across states, both domestically and as a factor complicating international cooperation.
Key takeaways
- The UN's General Assembly (universal, non-binding), Security Council (fifteen members, binding, P5 veto), ECOSOC, ICJ (state disputes) and Secretariat divide its functions; R2P (2005) reframes intervention as the state's own primary duty, and the ICC (2002) tries individuals where the ICJ tries states.
- The Bretton Woods system (IMF, World Bank) and its successors (WTO, G-20, BRICS/New Development Bank) structure the political economy of a globalised order, alongside the ongoing North-South dialogue over a fairer economic order.
- The EU's deep, supranational integration contrasts with the AU's continental intervention-right, the SCO's Eurasian security focus, and ASEAN's consensus-based 'ASEAN way'.
- Terrorism, climate change (UNFCCC-Kyoto-Paris), human rights (UDHR 1948, ICCPR/ICESCR 1966), migration/refugees (1951 Convention's non-refoulement) and identity politics are transnational challenges no single institution fully contains.
- India has not ratified the ICC's Rome Statute, and remains outside binding supranational structures like the EU's while engaging G-20, BRICS and the SCO as a member.
Practice questions (9)
Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.
Among the UN's principal organs, decisions that bind all member states on matters of peace and security are made by:
Show answer
Answer: A — The Security Council
Only the Security Council's decisions on peace and security bind all member states; the General Assembly recommends, ECOSOC coordinates economic-social work, and the Secretariat administers.The Responsibility to Protect (R2P), endorsed at the 2005 World Summit, reframes humanitarian intervention as:
Show answer
Answer: A — The state's own primary responsibility, with international action only if it manifestly fails
R2P's own structure places the primary duty on the state itself, narrower and more consensual than earlier unilateral humanitarian-intervention doctrine.The International Criminal Court (ICC), unlike the ICJ, tries:
Show answer
Answer: A — Individuals for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and aggression
The ICC (Rome Statute 1998/2002) tries individuals, unlike the ICJ's state-to-state jurisdiction; India has not ratified the Rome Statute.The Bretton Woods system (1944) established which two institutions alongside a fixed exchange-rate system?
Show answer
Answer: A — The IMF and the World Bank
The IMF and World Bank are Bretton Woods's own 1944 creations; the WTO came later (1995), and the EU/ASEAN/G-20/BRICS are unrelated regional or economic groupings.BRICS's New Development Bank (2015) is best understood as:
Show answer
Answer: A — An alternative source of development financing to Bretton Woods institutions
The New Development Bank offers emerging economies financing alternatives to the IMF/World Bank, not a security, judicial or counter-terrorism function.The European Union is distinguished from ASEAN chiefly by:
Show answer
Answer: A — Pooling sovereignty through binding supranational institutions
The EU's supranational, binding pooling of sovereignty (Commission, Parliament, Court of Justice) is its defining feature, unlike ASEAN's consensus-based 'ASEAN way'; the other options describe the SCO, AU and WTO.The African Union's Constitutive Act distinctively asserts:
Show answer
Answer: A — A right to intervene in a member state facing genocide or war crimes
This intervention-right is the AU's own distinctive departure from the older OAU's strict non-interference norm, unlike ASEAN which retains non-interference as central.The 1951 Refugee Convention's principle of non-refoulement means:
Show answer
Answer: A — A refugee must not be returned to a country where they face persecution
Non-refoulement is precisely this protection against forced return to persecution; the Convention notably does not clearly cover climate-driven displacement, a live gap this unit flags.The Paris Agreement (2015), unlike the earlier Kyoto Protocol, structures climate commitments around:
Show answer
Answer: A — Nationally determined contributions rather than binding top-down targets
Nationally determined contributions are the Paris Agreement's own distinctive, more flexible approach compared to Kyoto's binding targets for developed countries.