State and District Administration: the Governor, Chief Minister and Council of Ministers; the Chief Secretary, State Secretariat, Directorates and Commissionerates; the District Collector; Autonomous District Councils and the DRDA; the Evolution of Local Governance
2. The Chief Secretary, the State Secretariat, directorates and commissionerates
The State Secretariat is the policy-making staff of the state government: it is organised into departments, each under a minister, with a Secretary (in larger states often an Additional Chief Secretary or Principal Secretary) as administrative head, and deputy, under and assistant secretaries below. It prepares policy, legislation and the budget, controls finance and personnel, and supervises execution — but it does not itself execute. Execution is the work of the directorates, the executive agencies headed by technical or administrative directors (Director of Agriculture, Director of Health Services, Director of Public Instruction), which run field staff down to the district and block.
| Secretariat | Directorate |
|---|---|
| Staff agency: policy, planning, legislation, budget | Line agency: execution of policy through field staff |
| Headed by a Secretary, usually a generalist IAS officer | Headed by a Director, often a technical specialist |
| Advises the minister; answers to the legislature through the minister | Reports to the secretariat department; runs district and block offices |
The relationship has three patterns: the two may be separate (the classical pattern, with frequent friction over file movement and the subordination of technical heads to generalist secretaries), merged (the head of department is also ex-officio secretary, as was done in some states to cut delay), or partly integrated. The Chief Secretary, the senior-most civil servant of the state, is head of the state secretariat and of the state civil services, secretary to the Council of Ministers, chief coordinator of the departments, chief adviser to the Chief Minister, and the head of crisis management; he is the link between the state and the Union Cabinet Secretary. A commissionerate is used in two senses: the divisional commissioner, an officer above the Collectors who supervises the districts of a revenue division; and a commissionerate as a functional executive agency headed by a Commissioner (for example, of commercial taxes or of police in a metropolitan city).
3. District administration and the District Collector
The district is the basic territorial unit of administration, descended from the Mughal sarkar. The British office of Collector was created by Warren Hastings in 1772 for revenue collection, briefly abolished and restored, and settled in its classic form under Cornwallis and his successors; the Collector gradually became also District Magistrate and the chief agent of government in the district. After independence, community development (1952) and planning added the role of development coordinator, and the Collector became, in the phrase of many writers, the "maid of all work". The district may be divided into sub-divisions under Sub-Divisional Officers and into tehsils or taluks under tehsildars, with blocks as development units.
| Role | Functions |
|---|---|
| Collector (revenue) | Land revenue assessment and collection; land records; land acquisition; recovery of government dues; relief in natural calamities |
| District Magistrate (order) | Law and order with the Superintendent of Police; licensing (arms, explosives); preventive orders; supervision of executive magistrates; jails |
| Development coordinator | Coordinating line departments; implementing centrally sponsored and state schemes; chairing district committees; often chief executive of the DRDA or linked to the Zila Parishad |
| Other roles | District Election Officer; chairperson of the District Disaster Management Authority; census and protocol; public grievances |
The Collector's changing role is a standing debate. Democratic decentralisation after the 73rd Amendment transferred development functions to elected Zila Parishads, whose chief executive officers are often separate officers, raising the question whether the Collector should coordinate or step back. The growth of specialist departments, the commissionerate system of policing in cities, frequent transfers and political pressure have narrowed the office's autonomy, while new responsibilities — disaster management, elections, flagship-scheme monitoring and digital service delivery — have widened its load. The Second ARC's fifteenth report, State and District Administration (2009), recommended that the Collector concentrate on regulatory and coordinating functions and let local governments own development.
4. Autonomous District Councils and the District Rural Development Agency
Autonomous District Councils are created under the Sixth Schedule (Articles 244(2) and 275(1)) for tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. Each council has up to thirty members, of whom up to four are nominated by the Governor and the rest elected by adult suffrage, for five years. They have legislative powers over land, forests (other than reserved forests), shifting cultivation, inheritance, marriage and social customs, village and town administration and the appointment of chiefs, subject to the Governor's assent; judicial powers through village councils and courts for suits and cases between tribals; executive powers to establish and manage primary schools, dispensaries, markets, roads and fisheries; and financial powers to levy land revenue and certain taxes. They reflect a model of protective autonomy different from the Fifth Schedule, which governs scheduled areas elsewhere through Tribes Advisory Councils, and from PESA (1996), which extends panchayats to Fifth Schedule areas.
The District Rural Development Agency was created in the early 1980s, registered as a society, to implement the Integrated Rural Development Programme (1978–80) and later anti-poverty and wage-employment schemes. It gave the district a professional, project-based implementing arm with its own funds, usually chaired by the Collector or the Zila Parishad chairperson with a project director as executive. Its weakness was that it ran parallel to elected panchayats; after the 73rd Amendment the Union steadily pressed for merger, and the separate DRDA administration scheme ended in 2022, when states were asked to merge DRDAs into the Zila Parishads.
5. The evolution of local governance in India
| Year | Milestone | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| 1687 | Madras Municipal Corporation | The first municipal body in India |
| 1870 | Lord Mayo's resolution | Financial decentralisation to provinces and local funds |
| 1882 | Lord Ripon's resolution | Elected non-official majorities and chairmen in local boards — Ripon is called the "father of local self-government" in India |
| 1907–09 | Royal Commission on Decentralisation (Hobhouse) | Recommended village panchayats and elected chairmen |
| 1919 | Government of India Act | Local self-government became a "transferred" subject under provincial ministers |
| 1950 | Article 40 (Directive Principles) | The state shall organise village panchayats as units of self-government |
| 1957 | Balwantrai Mehta Committee | "Democratic decentralisation": a three-tier structure (village, block, district), with the block samiti as the key tier; first implemented at Nagaur in Rajasthan on 2 October 1959 |
| 1977–78 | Ashok Mehta Committee | A two-tier system with the Zila Parishad and Mandal Panchayat; open participation of political parties |
| 1985–86 | G. V. K. Rao and L. M. Singhvi Committees | Rao: the district as the key unit of planning; Singhvi: constitutional recognition of local self-government |
| 1989 | 64th Amendment Bill | Passed by the Lok Sabha but defeated in the Rajya Sabha |
| 1992 | 73rd and 74th Amendments | Constitutional status for panchayats and municipalities (in force 1993) — the subject of the next chapter |
Key takeaways
- The Governor acts on ministerial advice except where the Constitution requires discretion; the Chief Minister is the real executive and heads a council capped at fifteen per cent of the assembly.
- The secretariat makes policy and the directorates execute it; the Chief Secretary heads the secretariat and the state services and coordinates the departments.
- The Collector (created 1772) combines revenue, magisterial and development roles; decentralisation and specialisation have made that role contested.
- Autonomous District Councils under the Sixth Schedule serve tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram; DRDAs were merged into Zila Parishads from 2022.
- Ripon (1882) is the father of local self-government; Balwantrai Mehta (1957) gave three tiers, first at Nagaur on 2 October 1959; Ashok Mehta (1978) proposed two.
Practice questions (10)
Attempt each one before opening the answer. Every explanation names the tempting wrong option as well as the right one, because that is where marks are lost.
Who is called the "father of local self-government" in India?
Show answer
Answer: B — Lord Ripon
Ripon's resolution of 1882 provided for elected non-official majorities in local bodies. Mayo's 1870 resolution was about financial decentralisation; Hastings created the Collector and Cornwallis the professional civil service.The Balwantrai Mehta Committee's scheme of democratic decentralisation was first implemented at:
Show answer
Answer: D — Nagaur, Rajasthan, on 2 October 1959
Prime Minister Nehru inaugurated panchayati raj at Nagaur on 2 October 1959. 2 October 1952 was the start of the community development programme; Madras city had the first municipal corporation in 1687.In which of the following states are Autonomous District Councils constituted under the Sixth Schedule? Select all that apply.
Show answer
Answer: C — Mizoram; D — Meghalaya
The Sixth Schedule covers tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram. Jharkhand and Odisha have scheduled areas under the Fifth Schedule, governed through Tribes Advisory Councils and PESA.Which of the following is a function of the directorates rather than the state secretariat?
Show answer
Answer: B — Executing policy through field staff in districts and blocks
Directorates are the executive, line agencies. Framing legislation, budgeting and policy advice are staff functions of the secretariat.Assertion (A): The Ashok Mehta Committee recommended a two-tier panchayati raj system. Reason (R): It regarded the district as large enough to supply the planning expertise that the block lacked, with Mandal Panchayats below it. Choose the correct option.
Show answer
Answer: A — Both A and R are true, and R is the correct explanation of A
Both are true and R explains A: Ashok Mehta moved the key tier from Balwantrai Mehta's block to the district for planning capacity, pairing it with Mandal Panchayats — hence two tiers.In which year did Warren Hastings create the office of Collector? Type a number.
Numerical answer — type the value.
Show answer
Answer: 1772
Hastings created the Collector in 1772 to collect land revenue; the office was reshaped several times before combining revenue and magisterial powers in the nineteenth century.Which of the following are functions of the Chief Secretary of a state? Select all that apply.
Show answer
Answer: A — Chief coordinator of the secretariat departments; B — Head of the state civil services; D — Secretary to the Council of Ministers
The Chief Secretary is secretary to the Cabinet, chief coordinator and head of the civil services. The assembly is presided over by the Speaker, an elected member.The District Rural Development Agency was created chiefly to implement:
Show answer
Answer: D — The Integrated Rural Development Programme
DRDAs were set up to run the IRDP and later rural poverty and wage-employment programmes; they were eventually merged into the Zila Parishads.The Second Administrative Reforms Commission's recommendation on the Collector's role, in its report on State and District Administration, was that the Collector should:
Show answer
Answer: C — Concentrate on regulatory and coordinating functions while elected local governments own development
The Commission's fifteenth report (2009) reconciled the Collector with decentralisation by separating regulation and coordination from development, which it assigned to local governments.Which committee recommended constitutional recognition for local self-government in 1986?
Show answer
Answer: A — The L. M. Singhvi Committee
Singhvi's committee (1986) recommended that local self-government be recognised and protected in the Constitution, the idea the 64th Amendment Bill (1989) and then the 73rd Amendment (1992) carried forward.